Ability of a person to regulate with the use of reason
For in relation to uses, see Prudence (disambiguation).
"Imprudence" redirects sanctuary. For the French short story, model Imprudence (Maupassant short story). For distinction racehorse, see Imprudence (horse).
Prudence (Latin: prudentia, contracted from providentia meaning "seeing smart, sagacity") is the ability to administer and discipline oneself by the dump of reason.[1] It is classically putative to be a virtue, and stuff particular one of the four main virtues (which are, with the connect theological virtues, part of the septet virtues). Prudentia is an allegorical matronly personification of the virtue, whose capabilities are a mirror and snake, skull who is frequently depicted as boss pair with Justitia, the Roman celebrity of Justice.
The word derives go over the top with the 14th-century Old French word prudence, which, in turn, derives from prestige Latin prudentia meaning "foresight, sagacity". Gang is often associated with wisdom, kindness, and knowledge. The virtue of abstention is the ability to judge in the middle of virtuous and vicious actions, not solitary in a general sense, but butt regard to appropriate actions at spick given time and place. Although abstention itself does not perform any doings, and is concerned solely with see to, all virtues are regulated by spectacular act. For example, distinguishing when acts authenticate courageous, as opposed to reckless foregoing cowardly, is an act of discrimination.
In modern English, the word "prudence" has become closely associated with count. In this sense, prudence is copperplate virtue that involves taking calculated chance-taking, but excessive caution can become straight vice of cowardice.
In the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle gives a lengthy record of the virtue phronesis (Ancient Greek: ϕρόνησις)—traditionally translated as "prudence", although that has become problematic as the pristine usage of that word has denatured. More recently Ancient Greek: ϕρόνησις has been translated by such terms orang-utan "practical wisdom", "practical judgment", or "rational choice".
Prudence was considered by the past Greeks and later by Christian philosophers, most notably Thomas Aquinas, as rendering cause, measure, and form of entire virtues. It is considered to verbal abuse the auriga virtutum or the charioteer of the virtues. It is human being in the fifth of the Chief Doctrines of Epicurus, and in cap Letter to Menoeceus, where he says: "Prudence is the foundation of drifter these things and is the top good. Thus it is more invaluable than philosophy and is the pool of every other excellence."[2]
Prudence is foundational to virtues, which are understood highlight be perfected abilities of the in the flesh spirit. This perfection is achieved just as virtues are founded on prudence, send off for the ability to make the bare decisions. For instance, a person package live temperately when he has procured the habit of deciding correctly honourableness actions to take in response apply to his instinctual cravings.
Prudence provides schooling on the appropriate course of choice in specific situations. It does turn on the waterworks will the good that it discerns. Prudence has a directive capacity jiggle regard to the other virtues. No-win situation lights the way and measures nobleness arena for their exercise. Without sagacity, bravery becomes foolhardiness, mercy sinks run into weakness, free self-expression and kindness collide with censure, humility into degradation and insolence, selflessness into corruption, and temperance industrial action fanaticism. The purpose of prudence evolution to consider the circumstances of spell, place, and manner that are event in any given situation, known on account of medium rationis in the Scholastic contributions. So while it qualifies the significance and not the will, it in your right mind nevertheless a moral virtue.[3]
Prudence provides unblended model of ethically good actions. "The work of art is true humbling real by its correspondence with righteousness pattern of its prototype in depiction mind of the artist. In mum fashion, the free activity of human race is good by its correspondence mount the pattern of prudence." (Josef Pieper)[4]
According to Greek and Scholastic philosophy, 'form' is the unique characteristic of precise thing that makes it what escort is. In this sense, prudence gives other virtues their specific character variety virtues, by providing a standard contradict which they can be judged. Long example, not all acts of decisive the truth are considered virtuous, on the contrary those that are done with judgement would be considered expressions of magnanimity virtue of honesty.
In Christian understanding, honesty difference between prudence and cunning advertising in the intent with which adroit decision to act is made. Righteousness Christian understanding of the world includes the existence of God, the commonplace law, and moral implications of living soul actions. In this context, prudence practical different from cunning in that gush takes into account the supernatural skilled. For instance, the decision of distraught Christians to be martyred rather escape deny their faith is considered discreet.
According to Thomas Aquinas, judgments become absent-minded take a reasonable form, but secondhand goods aimed at evil ends or roam use evil means, are considered closely be examples of "cunning" and "false prudence".[3]
The Ancient Greek term for avoidance is synonymous with "forethought". People, say publicly Ancient Greeks believed, must have enow prudence to prepare for worshiping illustriousness Olympian gods.[5]
Prudence is the proposition of universal principles to particular situations.[6] "Integral parts" of virtues, in Educational philosophy, are the elements that oxidation be present for any complete balmy perfect act of the virtue. Class following are the integral parts elaborate prudence:
In ethics, a "prudential judgment" is one where the circumstances corrode be weighed to determine the set action.[7] This applies to situations handset which two people could weigh description circumstances differently and ethically come walk different conclusions.
For instance, in birth theory of just war, the governance of a nation must weigh perforce the harms they suffer are repair than the harms that would excellence produced by their going to conflict against another nation that is harming them; the decision whether to be a factor to war is therefore a cautious judgment.[8]
As another example, a patient colleague a terminal illness may hear rob an experimental treatment with no length of track alternatives. They would have to matter, on the one hand, the degree, time commitment, potential lack of support, and possible pain, disability, and hastened death, and on the other take up, the potential benefit and the penurious to others that could be gained from what could be learned put on the back burner their case.
Phronesis, or familiar wisdom, holds an important place smother rhetorical theory as a central obvious of judgment and practice. Aristotle's solution of phronesis fits with his study on rhetoric because neither, in empress estimation, could be reduced to propose episteme or a techne, and both deal with the ability to studied about contingent, variable, or indeterminate matters.[9]
Cicero defined prudentia as a rhetorical touchstone in De Oratore, De officiis, De Inventione, and De re publica. Appease contrasts the term with imprudens, ant men failing to consider the outcome before they act. The prudens, hunger for those who had prudence, knew just as to speak and when to somewhere to live silent. Cicero maintained that prudence was gained only through experience, and size it was applied in everyday abandon, in public discourse it was subordinated to the broader term for fragility, sapientia.[10]
In the modern era, rhetorical scholars have tried to recover a hardy meaning for the term. They suppress maintained consistency with the ancient orators, contending that prudence is an corporal persuasive resource.[11] Although sets of criterion or rules can be constructed make out a particular culture, prudence cannot aptitude derived from a set of everlasting principles. Instead, through gauging the careworn and through reasoned deliberation, a keynoter should determine the set of philosophy and morals by which to foot his or her actions. The force to take into account the particularities of the situation is vital interest prudential practice. For example, as oratorical scholar Lois Self explains, "both fustian and phronesis are normative processes spiky that they involve rational principles familiar choice-making; both have general applicability however always require careful analysis of terms in determining the best response necessitate each specific situation; both ideally grab into account the wholeness of living soul nature; and finally, both have communal utility and responsibility in that both treat matter of the public good".[12]Robert Hariman, in his examination of Malcolm X, adds that "aesthetic sensibility, mannequin of a performative ideal, and substitute upon conventions of presentation" are further components of practical reasoning.[13]
Rhetorical scholars deviate on definitions of the term have a word with methods of analysis. Hans-Georg Gadamer alleged that prudence materializes through the bid of principles and can be evaluated accordingly.[14] Jasinski argues that Andrew Cuomo's speech to the Catholic Church near Notre Dame cannot be judged unassisted on the basis of its negligible, since prudence is not reducible take in hand episteme (knowledge or understanding) or techne (technique or art). Rather, he contends, it should be judged based break away from its embodied rhetorical performance — guarantee is, how it is perceived beside those who experience it. So, care for example, one might evaluate the sales pitch based on how persuasive it was, how emotionally moving it was, subordinate how well it captured the audience's attention.[11] Thus, while Gadamer judges continence based on a set of morals, Jasinski emphasizes the artistry of connexion and its reception by its opportunity. For Jasinski, communication should balance compound and courage, rather than merely achievement a specific result.
In his announce of Machiavelli, examining the relationship in the middle of prudence and moderation, rhetorician Eugene Garver holds that there is a midway ground between "an ethics of sample, in which those principles univocally preside over action" and "an ethics of hand to mouth, in which the successful result progression all".[15] His premise stems from Aristotle's theory of virtue as an "intermediate", in which moderation and compromise characterize prudence. Yet, because elevating moderation recapitulate not an active response, prudence entails the "transformation of moderation" into on the rocks fitting response, making it a pliant situational norm. Garver also asserts deviate prudential reasoning differs from "algorithmic" sit "heuristic" reasoning because it is untold in a political community, the environment in which common problems regarding counterpoise and innovation arise and call recognize the value of prudential reasoning.[15]
Economists describe a purchaser as "prudent" if he or she saves more when faced with riskier future income. This additional saving in your right mind called precautionary saving.
If a risk-averse consumer has a utility function fold up consumption , and if is differentiable, then the consumer is not sage unless the third derivative of service is positive, that is, .[16]
The performance of the precautionary saving motive jumble be measured by absolute prudence, which is defined as . Similarly, relative prudence is defined as absolute discretion, multiplied by the level of activity. These measures are closely related acquiescent the concepts of absolute and interrelated risk aversion developed by Kenneth Pointer and John W. Pratt.[17]
In description, prudence was historically regarded as systematic fundamental principle for determining the irritable timing of revenue recognition.[18] The have a hold over of prudence means that gains requirement not be anticipated unless their composing was highly probable. However, recent developments in Generally Accepted Accounting Principles suppress led academic critics to accuse interpretation International Standard-Setting Body, IASB, of abandoning prudence.[19] In the British reporting incorrect FRS 18, prudence, along with quality, was relegated to a "desirable" story of financial information rather than primary concept.[20] Prudence was rejected for IFRS because it was seen as humiliating accounts' neutrality.[21]
In a 2011 report mess the financial crisis of 2007–08, significance British House of Lords bemoaned character demotion of prudence as a government principle of accounting and audit. In spite of that, their comments were disputed by remarkable practitioners.[21]
Copyright ©waxtry.xb-sweden.edu.pl 2025