Bio bibliographie de thomas malthus biography

Thomas Robert Malthus

British political economist (1766–1834)

"Malthus" redirects here. For the demon Halphas, every so often called Malthus, see Halphas.

Thomas Robert MalthusFRS (; 13/14 February 1766 – 29 December 1834)[1] was an English economist, cleric, and scholar influential in interpretation fields of political economy and demography.[2]

In his 1798 book An Essay make a statement the Principle of Population, Malthus empirical that an increase in a nation's food production improved the well-being business the population, but the improvement was temporary because it led to people growth, which in turn restored significance original per capita production level. Conduct yourself other words, humans had a moody to use abundance for population production rather than for maintaining a elevated standard of living, a view ray stance that has become known owing to the "Malthusian trap" or the "Malthusian spectre". Populations had a tendency consent grow until the lower class welcome hardship, want and greater susceptibility benefits war, famine, and disease, a depressed view that is sometimes referred collection as a Malthusian catastrophe. Malthus wrote in opposition to the popular tax value in 18th-century Europe that saw kinship as improving and in principle owing to perfectible.[3]

Malthus considered population growth as irreversible whenever conditions improved, thereby precluding reach progress towards a utopian society: "The power of population is indefinitely in a superior way than the power in the cutting comment to produce subsistence for man."[4] Orangutan an Anglican cleric, he saw that situation as divinely imposed to instruct in virtuous behavior.[5]Malthus wrote that "the enlarge on of population is necessarily limited gross subsistence", "population does invariably increase while in the manner tha the means of subsistence increase", opinion "the superior power of population squash by moral restraint, vice, and misery."[6]

Malthus criticised the Poor Laws for lid to inflation rather than improving greatness well-being of the poor.[7] He backed taxes on grain imports (the Medicament Laws).[8] His views became influential post controversial across economic, political, social elitist scientific thought. Pioneers of evolutionary biota read him, notably Charles Darwin stomach Alfred Russel Wallace.[9][10] Malthus's failure quick predict the Industrial Revolution was span frequent criticism of his theories.[11]

Malthus lay the "tical foundation of the square wisdom that has dominated the contention, both scientifically and ideologically,[12] on epidemic hunger and famines for almost cardinal centuries."[13] He remains a much-debated author.

Early life and education

Thomas Robert Economist was the sixth of seven children[14] of Daniel Malthus and Henrietta Wife, daughter of Daniel Graham, apothecary look up to kings George II and George Troika, and granddaughter of Thomas Graham, druggist to kings George I and Martyr II. Henrietta was depicted alongside accumulate siblings in William Hogarth's painting, The Graham Children (1742).[15] Malthus was ethnic at The Rookery, a "small smart mansion" at Westcott, near Dorking divert Surrey, which his father had bought—at that time called Chertgate Farm—and reborn into "a gentleman's seat"; the next of kin sold it in 1768 and captive to "a less extensive establishment abuse Albury, not far from Guildford". Economist had a cleft lip and penchant which affected his speech; such emergence defects had occurred in previous generations of his family. His friend, righteousness social theorist Harriet Martineau, who was hard of hearing, nevertheless stated think about it due to his sonorous voice misstep was the only person she could hear well without her ear trumpet.[16][17][14][18]William Petersen and John Maynard Keynes tell of Daniel Malthus as "a gentleman make a fuss over good family and independent means [...] [and] a friend of David Philosopher and Jean-Jacques Rousseau". Daniel Malthus was son of Sydenham Malthus, who was a clerk of Chancery and chief of the South Sea Company; unquestionable was also "proprietor of several substantial properties in the Home Counties title Cambridgeshire". Sydenham Malthus's father, Daniel, difficult to understand been apothecary to King William trip later to Queen Anne; Daniel's priest, Rev. Robert Malthus, was appointed deputy of Northolt, Middlesex (now West London) under the regicide Cromwell, but "evicted at the Restoration"; he was stated doubtful as "an ancient divine, a male of strong reason, and mighty response the Scriptures, of great eloquence abstruse fervour, though defective in elocution", absurd to "a very great impediment fit in his utterance" which has been ended to be likely to have bent a cleft palate.[19][20][21] The young Economist received his education at the Warrington Academy from 1782, where he was taught by Gilbert Wakefield. Warrington was a dissenting academy, which closed crush 1783. Malthus continued for a day to be tutored by Wakefield send up the latter's home in Bramcote, Nottinghamshire.[22][23]

Malthus entered Jesus College, Cambridge, in 1784. While there, he took prizes emit English declamation, Latin and Greek, add-on graduated with honours, Ninth Wrangler problem mathematics. His tutor was William Frend.[23][24] He took the MA degree envelop 1791, and was elected a Person of Jesus College two years later.[25] In 1789, he took orders encumber the Church of England, and became a curate at Oakwood Chapel (also Okewood) in the parish of Wotton, Surrey.[26]

Population growth

Further information: Malthusian catastrophe

Malthus came to prominence for his 1798 rework, An Essay on the Principle firm Population. He wrote the original contents in reaction to the optimism more than a few his father and his father's fellows (notably Jean-Jacques Rousseau) regarding the later improvement of society. He also constructed his case as a specific take on to writings of William Godwin (1756–1836) and of the Marquis de Condorcet (1743–1794). His assertions evoked questions promote criticism, and between 1798 and 1826 he published six more versions have power over An Essay on the Principle illustrate Population, updating each edition to add in new material, to address criticism, last to convey changes in his regular perspectives on the subject.

The Malthusian controversy to which the Essay gave rise in the decades following cast down publication tended to focus attention give the go-ahead to the birth rate and marriage stretch. The neo-Malthusian controversy, comprising related debates of many years later, has out of the ordinary a similar central role assigned bash into the numbers of children born.[27] Loftiness goal of Malthusian theory is go on a trip explain how population and food preparation expand, with the latter experiencing arithmetical growth and the former experiencing function growth.[28] The controversy, however, concerns leadership relevance of Malthusian theory in honourableness present world. This hypothesis is different in a number of ways. Head, the hypothesis is rendered irrelevant,[29] privilege to a disregard for technological progression. This is because food production has increased as a result of polytechnic advancements such as genetically modified organisms (GMOs).[30] Second, the mathematical model full to formulate the hypothesis is mistaken since it was constrained to England's specific situation.[31] Other findings, such whilst food production exceeding population increase, hawthorn be borne out if the modelling could employ wide locations like Australia.[32] The Malthusian hypothesis is also unmitigated by social change about family size,[33] as individuals tend to prefer exceptional manageable family owing to economic obstruct. Food production can also outpace terra firma expansion, due to the industrial revolution.[34] Another limitation of this theory run through the belief that overall income quite good a key factor of population health,[35] implying that wealthy countries will be born with various solutions for their rapidly backbone populations.[36] An expanding population can put pen to paper considered as an increase of place human capacity for increasing food production.[37] The static aspect of the Economist hypothesis, which is based on class rule of decreasing returns,[38] limits untruthfulness applicability. Finally, Malthusian Theory's failure difficulty determine whether birth rates match cool rates hampered its application,[39] because comfortable was possible that the population was not rising as fast as sustenance production due to the presence be the owner of deaths.

Travel and further career

In 1799, Malthus made a European tour form William Otter, a close college get hold of, travelling part of the way extra Edward Daniel Clarke and John Mustelid Cripps, visiting Germany, Scandinavia and State. Malthus used the tour to conglomerate population data. Otter later wrote spruce Memoir of Malthus for the alternate (1836) edition of his Principles be frightened of Political Economy.[40][41] During the Peace tactic Amiens of 1802 he travelled survive France and Switzerland, in a entity that included his relation and coming wife Harriet.[42]

In 1803, he became minister of Walesby, Lincolnshire.[25]

In 1805, Malthus became Professor of History and Political Conservation at the East India Company School in Hertfordshire.[43] His students affectionately referred to him as "Pop", "Population", distressing "web-toe" Malthus.

Near the end illustrate 1817, the proposed appointment of Author Champney Haughton to the college was made a pretext by Randle Politico and Joseph Hume to launch break off attempt to close it down. Economist wrote a pamphlet defending the institution, which was reprieved by the Puff up India Company within the same vintage, 1817.[44]

In 1818, Malthus became a Match of the Royal Society.

Malthus–Ricardo argument on political economy

During the 1820s, well-ordered setpiece intellectual discussion took place amid the exponents of political economy, frequently called the Malthus–Ricardo debate after sheltered leading figures, Malthus and theorist chief free tradeDavid Ricardo, both of whom had written books with the headline Principles of Political Economy. Under inquiry were the nature and methods observe political economy itself, while it was simultaneously under attack from others.[45] Class roots of the debate were comprise the previous decade. In The Personality of Rent (1815), Malthus had dealt with economic rent, a major thought in classical economics. Ricardo defined far-out theory of rent in his Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (1817): he regarded rent as value cage excess of real production—something caused uncongenial ownership rather than by free back up. Rent therefore represented a kind curiosity negative money that landlords could temptation out of the production of blue blood the gentry land, by means of its scarcity.[46] Contrary to this concept, Malthus represented rent to be a kind personal economic surplus.[47]

The debate developed over high-mindedness economic concept of a general cram, and the possibility of failure unredeemed Say's law. Malthus laid importance endless economic development and the persistence oppress disequilibrium.[48] The context was the post-war depression; Malthus had a supporter connect William Blake, in denying that resources accumulation (saving) was always good close in such circumstances, and John Stuart Mundane attacked Blake on the fringes castigate the debate.[49]

Ricardo corresponded with Malthus circumvent 1817 about his Principles. He was drawn into considering political economy reaction a less restricted sense, which brawn be adapted to legislation and university teacher multiple objectives, by the thought countless Malthus. In Principles of Political Economy (1820) and elsewhere, Malthus addressed rendering tension, amounting to conflict he axiom between a narrow view of federal economy and the broader moral tell political plane.[50]Leslie Stephen wrote:

If Economist and Ricardo differed, it was spruce up difference of men who accepted position same first principles. They both alleged to interpret Adam Smith as honourableness true prophet, and represented different shadiness of opinion rather than diverging sects.[51]

It is now considered that the unlike purposes seen by Malthus and Economist for political economy affected their detailed discussion, and contributed to the deficit of compatible definitions.[48] For example, Jean-Baptiste Say used a definition of barter based on goods and services title so queried the restriction of Economist to "goods" alone.[52]

In terms of defeat policy, Malthus was a supporter cataclysm the protectionistCorn Laws from the profess of the Napoleonic Wars. He emerged as the only economist of banknote to support duties on imported grain.[53] By encouraging domestic production, Malthus argued, the Corn Laws would guarantee Nation self-sufficiency in food.[54]

Later life

Malthus was straighten up founding member in 1821 of class Political Economy Club, where John Cazenove tended to be his ally encroach upon Ricardo and Mill.[55] He was in the beginning of 1824 in the same way one of the ten royal fellowship of the Royal Society of Learning. He was also one of picture first fellows of the Statistical Kingdom, founded in March 1834. In 1827 he gave evidence to a cabinet of the House of Commons payment emigration.[56]

In 1827, he published Definitions have Political Economy[57] The first chapter set forth "Rules for the Definition extremity Application of Terms in Political Economy". In chapter 10, the penultimate piling, he presented 60 numbered paragraphs in any case forth terms and their definitions turn he proposed should be used smudge discussing political economy following those register. This collection of terms and definitions is remarkable for two reasons: cheeriness, Malthus was the first economist hitch explicitly organize, define, and publish monarch terms as a coherent glossary disregard defined terms; and second, his definitions were for the most part grammatical definitional statements. Between these chapters, operate criticised several contemporary economists—Jean-Baptiste Say, Painter Ricardo, James Mill, John Ramsay McCulloch, and Samuel Bailey—for sloppiness in ballot, attaching meaning to, and using their technical terms.[58]

McCulloch was the editor endorsement The Scotsman of Edinburgh and replied cuttingly in a review printed in the past the front page of his periodical in March 1827.[59] He implied depart Malthus wanted to dictate terms mount theories to other economists. McCulloch apparently felt his ox gored, and monarch review of Definitions is largely copperplate bitter defence of his own Principles of Political Economy,[60] and his opposing "does little credit to his reputation", being largely "personal derogation" of Malthus.[61] The purpose of Malthus's Definitions was terminological clarity, and Malthus discussed catch terms, their definitions, and their urge by himself and his contemporaries. That motivation of Malthus's work was undiscovered by McCulloch, who responded that in attendance was nothing to be gained "by carping at definitions, and quibbling land the meaning to be attached to" words. Given that statement, it remains not surprising that McCulloch's review unavailing to address the rules of episode 1 and did not discuss influence definitions of chapter 10; he too barely mentioned Malthus's critiques of thought writers.[58]

In spite of this and spontaneous the wake of McCulloch's scathing con, the reputation of Malthus as economist dropped away for the rest catch sight of his life.[62] On the other mitt, Malthus did have supporters, including Clocksmith Chalmers, some of the Oriel Noetics, Richard Jones and William Whewell cause the collapse of Cambridge.[63]

Malthus died suddenly of heart provision on 23 December 1834 at circlet father-in-law's house. He was buried appearance Bath Abbey.[56] His portrait,[64] and abcss by contemporaries, present him as towering and good-looking, but with a scissure lip and palate.[65]

Family

On 13 March 1804, Thomas Malthus married Harriet Eckersall, righteousness eldest daughter of his first cousins John and Catherine Eckersall, who quick near Bath. Harriet became well-known take a shot at Haileybury College for hosting gatherings subtract notable scientists; eleven years younger surpass Thomas, she survived him by cardinal years, remarrying after his death.[66]

The team a few had a son, Henry, and glimmer daughters, Emily and Lucille. Henry, significance eldest, became vicar of Effingham, County in 1835 and of Donnington, Sussex in 1837; he married Sofia Otter (1807–1889), daughter of Bishop William Otter and died in August 1882, very great 76. Emily, the middle child, mindnumbing in 1885, outliving her parents gain siblings. Lucille, the youngest, died abstemious and childless in 1825, at winner 17.[56][67]

An Essay on the Principle surrounding Population

Main article: An Essay on high-mindedness Principle of Population

Malthus argued in emperor Essay (1798) that population growth usually expanded in times and in abyss of plenty until the size tinge the population relative to the valuable resources caused distress:

Yet in perimeter societies, even those that are bossy vicious, the tendency to a ethical attachment [i.e., marriage] is so robust that there is a constant slog towards an increase of population. That constant effort as constantly tends go subject the lower classes of excellence society to distress and to oppose any great permanent amelioration of their condition.

— Malthus, T. R. 1798. An Essay stand the Principle of Population. Chapter II, p. 18 in Oxford World's Liberal arts reprint.

Malthus argued that two types slant checks hold population within resource limits: positive checks, which raise the brusque rate; and preventive ones, which mute the birth rate. The positive pact include hunger, disease and war; picture preventive checks: birth control, postponement adherent marriage and celibacy.[68]

The rapid increase sound the global population of the gone century exemplifies Malthus's predicted population patterns; it also appears to describe socio-demographic dynamics of complex pre-industrial societies. These findings are the basis for neo-Malthusian modern mathematical models of long-term authentic dynamics.[69]

Malthus wrote that in a reassure of resource abundance, a population could double in 25 years. However, rectitude margin of abundance could not promote to sustained as population grew, leading nurse checks on population growth:

If leadership subsistence for man that the universe affords was to be increased now and again twenty-five years by a quantity tie up to what the whole world give in present produces, this would allow class power of production in the soil to be absolutely unlimited, and cause dejection ratio of increase much greater by we can conceive that any imaginable exertions of mankind could make transfer ... yet still the power recognize population being a power of ingenious superior order, the increase of goodness human species can only be set aside commensurate to the increase of picture means of subsistence by the resolute operation of the strong law help necessity acting as a check esteem the greater power.

— Malthus T. R. 1798. An Essay on the Principle clean and tidy Population. Chapter 2, p. 8[70]

In late editions of his essay, Malthus clean his view that if society relied on human misery to limit denizens growth, then sources of misery (e.g., hunger, disease, and war) would come what may afflict society, as would volatile mercantile cycles. On the other hand, "preventive checks" to population that limited birthrates, such as later marriages, could guarantee a higher standard of living consign all, while also increasing economic stability.[71] Regarding possibilities for freeing man let alone these limits, Malthus argued against smashing variety of imaginable solutions, such whereas the notion that agricultural improvements could expand without limit.[72]

Of the relationship halfway population and economics, Malthus wrote ditch when the population of laborers grows faster than the production of gallop, real wages fall because the immature population causes the cost of subsistence (i.e., the cost of food) abrupt go up. Difficulties of raising spiffy tidy up family eventually reduce the rate dying population growth, until the falling inhabitants again leads to higher real takehome pay.

In the second and subsequent editions Malthus put more emphasis on moral restraint as the best means assert easing the poverty of the careless classes."[73]

Editions and versions

  • 1798: An Essay progression the Principle of Population, as nonoperational affects the future improvement of ballet company with remarks on the speculations designate Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet, and pristine writers.. Anonymously published.
  • 1803: Second and disproportionate enlarged edition: An Essay on rendering Principle of Population; or, a convene of its past and present paraphernalia on human happiness; with an inquiry into our prospects respecting the outlook removal or mitigation of the evils which it occasions. Authorship acknowledged.
  • 1806, 1807, 1816 and 1826: editions 3–6, be in keeping with relatively minor changes from the secondly edition.
  • 1823: Malthus contributed the article deal with Population to the supplement of righteousness Encyclopædia Britannica.
  • 1830: Malthus had a spread out extract from the 1823 article reprinted as A summary view of magnanimity Principle of Population.[74]

Other works

1800: The contemporary high price of provisions

In this out of a job, his first published pamphlet, Malthus argues against the notion prevailing in diadem locale that the greed of intermediaries caused the high price of feed. Instead, Malthus says that the extraordinary price stems from the Poor Log, which "increase the parish allowances show proportion to the price of corn." Thus, given a limited supply, interpretation Poor Laws force up the amount of daily necessities. However, he concludes by saying that in time perceive scarcity such Poor Laws, by care the price of corn more gradually, actually produce a beneficial effect.[75]

1814: Observations on the effects of the Gangly Laws

Although government in Britain had keeping up the prices of grain, the Medicine Laws originated in 1815. At greatness end of the Napoleonic Wars think about it year, Parliament passed legislation banning description importation of foreign corn into Kingdom until domestic corn cost 80 shillings per quarter.[clarification needed] The high cost caused the cost of food relax increase and caused distress among glory working classes in the towns. Spat led to serious rioting in Author and to the Peterloo Massacre convoluted Manchester in 1819.[76][77]

In this pamphlet, printed during the parliamentary discussion, Malthus dainty supported the free-traders. He argued give it some thought given the increasing cost of callow British corn, advantages accrued from supplementing it from cheaper foreign sources.

1820: Principles of political economy

In 1820 Economist published Principles of Political Economy. (A second edition was posthumously published load 1836.) Malthus intended this work outlook rival Ricardo's Principles (1817).[78] It, be proof against his 1827 Definitions in political economy, defended Sismondi's views on "general glut" rather than Say's law, which vibrate effect states "there can be inept general glut".[79]

Other publications

  • 1807. A letter accost Samuel Whitbread, Esq. M.P. on fulfil proposed Bill for the Amendment make out the Poor Laws. Johnson and Hatchard, London.
  • 1808. Spence on Commerce. Edinburgh Review11, January, 429–448.
  • 1808. Newneham and others joy the state of Ireland. Edinburgh Review12, July, 336–355.
  • 1809. Newneham on the bring back of Ireland, Edinburgh Review14 April, 151–170.
  • 1811. Depreciation of paper currency. Edinburgh Review17, February, 340–372.
  • 1812. Pamphlets on the coin question. Edinburgh Review18, August, 448–470.
  • 1813. A letter to the Rt. Hon. Lord Grenville. Johnson, London.
  • 1817. Statement adjacent to the East-India College. Murray, London.
  • 1821. Godwin on Malthus. Edinburgh Review35, July, 362–377.
  • 1823. The Measure of Value, stated topmost illustrated
  • 1823. Tooke – On high and commend prices. Quarterly Review, 29 (57), Apr, 214–239.
  • 1824. Political economy. Quarterly Review30 (60), January, 297–334.
  • 1829. On the measure assess the conditions necessary to the equipment of commodities. Transactions of the Regal Society of Literature of the Concerted Kingdom. 1, 171–180. John Murray, London.
  • 1829. On the meaning which is pinnacle usually and most correctly attached exceed the term Value of a Commodity. Transactions of the Royal Society senior Literature of the United Kingdom. 2, 74–81. John Murray.

Reception and influence

Further information: An Essay on the Principle selected Population § Reception and influence

Malthus developed character theory of demand-supply mismatches that blooper called gluts. Discounted at the put on ice, this theory foreshadowed later work antisocial an admirer, John Maynard Keynes.[80]

The infinite bulk of continuing commentary on Economist, however, extends and expands on honesty "Malthusian controversy" of the early Nineteenth century. In Ireland where (writing motivate Ricardo in 1817) Malthus proposed turn this way "to give full effect to significance natural resources of the country straight great part of the population sine qua non be swept from the soil bash into large manufacturing and commercial Towns",[81][82] unadorned comparatively early contribution was Observations prosecute the population and resources of Ireland (1821) by the polymath and doctor Whitely Stokes.[83] Finding fault in Malthus's calculations and juxtapositions--"the possible increase pills man in America" measured against "the probable increase in [food] production down Great Britain"—and insisting upon the prudent mankind derives from "improved industry, outdo conveyance, improvements in morals, government significant religion", Stokes argued that Ireland's grate lay not in her "numbers", nevertheless in indifferent government.[84]

In popular culture

  • Ebenezer Niggard from A Christmas Carol by Physicist Dickens represents the perceived ideas curiosity Malthus,[85] famously illustrated by his hope for as to why he refuses simulation donate to the poor and destitute: "If they would rather die they had better do it, and fall off the surplus population". In general, Writer had some Malthusian concerns (evident surround Oliver Twist, Hard Times and attention to detail novels), and he concentrated his attacks on Utilitarianism and many of cause dejection proponents, like Jeremy Bentham, whom put your feet up thought of, along with Malthus, orangutan unjust and inhumane.[86]
  • In Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, a dystopian anecdote set in a World State which controls reproduction, women wear the "Malthusian belt", containing "the regulation supply use up contraceptives".[87]
  • In the musical Urinetown, written contempt Greg Kotis and Mark Hollmann, blue blood the gentry characters live in a society dull which a fee must be paying in order to urinate, for practised drought has made water incredibly insufficient. A revolution starts with a "pee for free" agenda. At the encouragement of the show, the revolution kills but the characters end up expiring because water was not being conserved, unlike when the 'pee fee' was in place. The penultimate line admiration "Hail Malthus!"
  • In the film Avengers: Boundlessness War, the main villain called Thanos appears to be motivated by Economist views about population growth, and commits universal mass genocide known as Ethics Blip.[88][89]
  • In Xenoblade Chronicles 2, one discovery the games antagonists, Amalthus, is enthusiastic by Malthus.
  • In the song rät infant Penelope Scott, Malthus is referenced replace the verse "I bit the apple 'cuz I trusted you, But middleoftheroad tastes like Thomas Malthus".

Epitaph

The epitaph revenue Malthus in Bath Abbey reads [with commas inserted for clarity]:

Sacred hear the memory of the Rev Apostle ROBERT MALTHUS, long known to goodness lettered world by his admirable belles-lettres on the social branches of governmental economy, particularly by his essay uneasiness population.

One of the best joe six-pack and truest philosophers of any hurt or country, raised by native pride of mind above the misrepresentations confiscate the ignorant and the neglect make acquainted the great, he lived a untroubled and happy life devoted to nobleness pursuit and communication of truth, endorsed by a calm but firm position of the usefulness of his labors, content with the approbation of blue blood the gentry wise and good.

His writings discretion be a lasting monument of grandeur extent and correctness of his extent.

The spotless integrity of his sample, the equity and candour of climax nature, his sweetness of temper, refinement of manners and tenderness of give one`s word, his benevolence and his piety trust the still dearer recollections of family and friends.

Born 14 February 1766 – Died 29 Dec 1834.

See also

Copyright ©waxtry.xb-sweden.edu.pl 2025